Never Ending NASCAR: A couple weeks ago, I started writing a column questioning the legitimacy of NASCAR as a real sport in the wake of the pre-chase debacle at Richmond and the subsequent corrective measures taken by Brian France in order to restore what he perceived to be the proper order. But, before I could really get the column researched and edited properly, I lost interest. I realized then that the real story here is not how NASCAR operates but that the NASCAR season is way too long. Don't get me wrong, I still tune in to the fall races. But only in between the other sporting events of October. NASCAR begins in February and lasts through the middle of November. That makes it way longer than even the baseball season. Sports fans have the entire month of August with nothing to talk about besides their fantasy football drafts. Instead of filling that block of time with the Chase for the Cup, NASCAR insists on having their playoffs compete with regular season NBA and NHL games and the Major League Baseball playoffs ... not to mention the juggernaut of professional and college football. I realize that there are a lot of financial considerations that go into this. But, I did take Econ 101 in college. And, it seems to me that NASCAR's supply greatly exceeds its demand.
(Tony Avelar/AP) |
MLB Hides the Ball: In an effort to make sure that no playoff games competed with each other for television airtime, MLB staggered all of the start times in the first round. In theory, this is a good idea. MLB doesn't want to have to compete with itself for viewers. But with four series going on at once, this plan required half of the games to be played in the afternoons. That made it nearly impossible for people with jobs to watch at least half of the games. And that's on the East Coast. On the West Coast, it's even worse. In the future, MLB should divide the NL and AL between two networks and allow viewers to use their remote controls. That way fans could watch half of every game instead of none of half the games.
(Al Messerschmidt/Getty Images) |
Condi on the Committee: Twitter was all abuzz the last few days over the announcement that Condoleeza Rice will be on the committee of folks who will decide which college football teams will be playing in the 4-team playoff that starts next year. A couple men who have football credentials and therefore access to the national airwaves stated that Ms. Rice has no business on the selection committee since she never played the game of football. As a girl who often writes about male sports, I take a little umbrage at that opinion. And, as a politically conservative woman in the South, Condoleeza Rice is one of my personal heroes. Regardless of your political affiliation, Dr. Rice's biography is impressive. I fully endorse her long-stated desire to be the first female commissioner of the National Football League. And yet, I agree that Condi should not have a vote on who should win the college football national championship. Why? Because no one should have a vote on a tiny 4-team playoff. I don't care if you're a former coach, an AD or a fan like Dr. Rice. We've already seen the controversy that surrounds the selection committee that assembles the field for March Madness. And that controversy is over what team should have been a 9th or 10th seed in a 68-team field. The idea that any committee can satisfactorily select the four teams that get to contend for the college football championship is absurd. Banshee Sports has previously proposed a revamped system for selecting a national champion. The changes I proposed were met with several critics stating that college football should not be changed since it is already the greatest thing on the sports landscape. Well, change is coming whether we like it or not. The only question is whether we'd rather have the Condi Rice selection committee or a system that actually makes some sense.
Check out Banshee Sports on Facebook. "Like" it if you like it.
No comments :
Post a Comment